Af­ter fif­ty ye­ars of si­len­ce, the Uni­ted Sta­tes go­vern­ment has be­gun to ad­d­ress its long his­to­ry of vi­o­len­ce against Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can child­ren in bo­ar­ding schools. Two ma­jor re­ports and a pre­si­den­ti­al apo­lo­gy rep­re­sent a sea-chan­ge in the of­fi­ci­al ap­p­ro­ach, and they form a key le­ga­cy for the Bi­den ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on. Even so, qu­es­ti­ons re­main as to whet­her re­cog­ni­ti­on will lead to red­ress for past harm.

From atrocities to tentative apologies

The his­to­ry of go­vern­ment in­vol­ve­ment in for­ced edu­ca­ti­on of Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can child­ren spans over a cen­tu­ry and a half. In 1819, the US go­vern­ment be­ca­me di­rect­ly in­vol­ved for the first time when it pas­sed the Ci­vi­li­za­ti­on Fund Act, which al­lo­wed the US to es­tab­lish schools and make cont­racts with re­li­gi­ous or­ga­ni­za­ti­ons to run schools. Af­ter the Ci­vil War, the go­vern­ment be­gan to take on a more pro­ac­ti­ve role in the as­si­mi­la­ti­on of Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans and the dis­pos­ses­si­on of their lands. Du­ring the 1880s and 1890s, the De­part­ment of the In­te­ri­or (DOI) over­saw the de­ve­lop­ment of hund­reds of schools with go­vern­ment-fun­ded te­ac­hers. These schools were of­ten harsh en­vi­ron­ments where child­ren li­ved away from their fa­mi­lies for ex­ten­ded pe­ri­ods, were for­ced to give up the cul­tu­ral prac­ti­ces of their an­ces­tors, and fa­ced abu­se and exp­loi­ta­ti­on.

 The hey­day of this sys­tem las­ted un­til the 1930s. A dam­ning 1928 re­port high­ligh­ted poor con­di­ti­ons at many schools and sub­par te­ac­hing, high­ligh­ting the need for re­forms. Over the fol­lo­wing de­ca­de, the Roo­se­velt ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on clo­sed se­ve­ral schools, ad­d­res­sed abu­se, and cre­a­ted more space for In­di­ge­nous cul­tu­res in edu­ca­ti­on. Even so, the US con­ti­nu­ed to se­pa­ra­te child­ren from their fa­mi­lies, and some schools re­mai­ned vi­o­lent en­vi­ron­ments. The Se­na­te even­tu­al­ly pub­lis­hed a ma­jor re­port on the fai­lu­res of Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can edu­ca­ti­on in 1969, cont­ri­bu­ting to the dec­li­ne of this sys­tem. With the gro­wing emp­ha­sis on self-de­ter­mi­na­ti­on for tri­bal na­ti­ons in the late 1960s, the bo­ar­ding school era thus came to a de­fi­ni­ti­ve end. Sin­ce then, the re­mai­ning schools have be­co­me pla­ces where Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can child­ren le­arn about their own cul­tu­res and lan­gu­a­ges. While not wit­hout their prob­lems, these schools are doing im­por­tant work to un­do the le­ga­cies of the bo­ar­ding schools.

 Even as the US go­vern­ment pas­sed le­gis­la­ti­on to pro­tect Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can child­ren, re­pat­ri­a­te cul­tu­ral ar­ti­facts, and ad­d­ress ot­her his­to­ri­cal wrong­doing, it sta­yed si­lent about its ac­ti­ons du­ring the bo­ar­ding school era for al­most fif­ty ye­ars. A ver­si­on of an apo­lo­gy to Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans came in 2009 in the form of a brief com­ment in a de­fen­se-spen­ding bill – with the disc­lai­mer that no claims could be made ba­sed on this sta­te­ment. In ot­her words, this apo­lo­gy was a way for the go­vern­ment to say so­met­hing wit­hout ac­tu­al­ly sa­ying anyt­hing, and not­hing came of it. By com­pa­ri­son, the Ca­na­di­an go­vern­ment had al­re­a­dy is­su­ed an apo­lo­gy for its re­si­den­ti­al school past and es­tab­lis­hed a Truth and Re­con­ci­li­a­ti­on Com­mis­si­on by 2008.

 Demanding to be heard

Alt­hough at­tempts to pass le­gis­la­ti­on on a US Truth Com­mis­si­on have lin­ge­red in Cong­ress, the exe­cu­ti­ve branch has ta­ken it upon it­self to be­gin the work of truth-fin­ding. With the ap­point­ment of Rep­re­sen­ta­ti­ve Deb Haa­land (La­gu­na Pu­eb­lo) as Sec­re­ta­ry of the In­te­ri­or in March of 2021, the DOI came un­der the le­a­ders­hip of a Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can per­son for the first time. Fol­lo­wing the dis­co­ve­ry of un­mar­ked gra­ves at a for­mer re­si­den­ti­al school in Ca­na­da that May, US bo­ar­ding schools re­cei­ved re­ne­wed at­ten­ti­on. Haa­land, whose grand­pa­rents and great-grand­pa­rents went to bo­ar­ding school, an­noun­ced the Fe­de­ral Bo­ar­ding School Ini­ti­a­ti­ve that June, star­ting a full in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on in­to this his­to­ry. In doing so, the DOI con­ti­nu­ed the le­ga­cy of the 1928 and 1969 re­ports, and set out to ex­pand the body of pub­lic­ly avai­lab­le know­led­ge on the sub­ject.

 In May 2022, the DOI re­le­a­sed an ini­ti­al re­port, a 106-page do­cu­ment out­li­ning its ini­ti­al fin­dings ba­sed on arc­hi­val re­se­arch and tri­bal con­sul­ta­ti­ons. The re­port desc­ri­bed what hap­pe­ned in frank terms and even ack­now­led­ged that dis­pos­ses­sing Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can land was a key goal. The DOI al­so exa­mi­ned to­pics like the fun­ding of the schools, stu­dent de­aths, and sup­port for sur­vi­vors. In the sum­mer of 2024, the Bo­ar­ding School Ini­ti­a­ti­ve conc­lu­ded its work with a se­cond re­port. The of­fi­ci­al num­ber of schools was ad­jus­ted to 417, and the re­port con­fir­med the de­ath of at le­ast 973 child­ren at these schools, the ac­tu­al num­ber pro­bab­ly being much hig­her. As part of the in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on, the DOI al­so or­ga­ni­zed a ‘Road to He­a­ling’ tour, gi­ving for­mer stu­dents a chan­ce to tell their sto­ries. This tour mar­ked the first ef­fort by the go­vern­ment to ac­ti­ve­ly lis­ten to sur­vi­vors and cre­a­te a re­cord of their ex­pe­rien­ces.

Steps toward healing

The re­port al­so es­tab­lis­hed a pos­sib­le road map for the fu­tu­re. Its eight re­com­men­da­ti­ons inc­lu­de a for­mal apo­lo­gy, in­vest­ments to ad­d­ress the le­ga­cies of the school sys­tem, the re­turn of the bo­dies of de­ce­a­sed stu­dents, in­for­ma­ti­on for the pub­lic, and coo­pe­ra­ti­on with count­ries like Ca­na­da. These re­com­men­da­ti­ons are far-re­ac­hing and would cons­ti­tu­te a sig­ni­fi­cant in­vest­ment on the part of the US go­vern­ment, which may pre­sent a chal­len­ge, but they il­lust­ra­te what can be done.

Pre­si­dent Joe Bi­den took a first step for­ward when he apo­lo­gi­zed for the go­vern­ment’s role in the his­to­ry of bo­ar­ding schools. In a speech on Oc­to­ber 25, 2024 at the Gila Ri­ver In­di­an Com­mu­ni­ty in Ari­zo­na, Bi­den spoke about what hap­pe­ned at the schools, ci­ting the tes­ti­mo­ny of sur­vi­vors, and re­fer­red to this his­to­ry as a “sin on our soul.” In ad­di­ti­on, he tal­ked about his ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on’s ac­comp­lish­ments for Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans, and con­tem­po­ra­ry prob­lems roo­ted in the bo­ar­ding school era. Bi­den stop­ped short of ma­king any conc­re­te pro­mi­ses, ho­we­ver, and on­ly spoke in ge­ne­ral terms about brin­ging past in­jus­ti­ces to light. Mo­re­o­ver, the de­ci­si­on to give this speech in Ari­zo­na a mere two weeks be­fo­re the No­vem­ber 2024 elec­ti­on me­ant that it re­cei­ved li­mi­ted at­ten­ti­on both in the US and ab­ro­ad. In res­pon­se, Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans stres­sed that this apo­lo­gy was a ne­ces­sa­ry step, but that more ac­ti­on is ne­ces­sa­ry. Even though there are qu­es­ti­ons about the ti­ming and the ef­fec­ti­ve­ness of the apo­lo­gy, this speech rep­re­sents an over­due re­cog­ni­ti­on of the ex­pe­rien­ces of those who were in these schools, and that alo­ne is im­men­se­ly va­lu­ab­le. 

Gi­ven the out­co­me of the 2024 elec­ti­ons, it is doubt­ful whet­her the go­vern­ment will imp­le­ment the DOI’s ot­her re­com­men­da­ti­ons in the near fu­tu­re. Do­nald Trump has shown lit­t­le con­cern for the in­te­rests of Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­can na­ti­ons and his ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on is un­li­ke­ly to con­ti­nue re­con­ci­li­a­ti­on ef­forts in the next four ye­ars. Li­ke­wi­se, Cong­ress has at­temp­ted to pass a so-cal­led Truth and He­a­ling Bill sin­ce 2020, but it is un­cer­tain whet­her that ef­fort to pass le­gis­la­ti­on will suc­ceed any­ti­me soon. Re­gard­less of what hap­pens on the fe­de­ral le­vel, ho­we­ver, scho­lars and ad­vo­ca­cy groups like the Na­ti­o­nal Bo­ar­ding School He­a­ling Co­a­li­ti­on will con­ti­nue to re­se­arch this his­to­ry and help sur­vi­vors heal. Lo­cal ef­forts are al­re­a­dy un­der­way as well, inc­lu­ding the re­turn of the re­mains of stu­dents who died at the schools, and these will con­ti­nue even wit­hout ad­di­ti­o­nal fe­de­ral re­sour­ces.

In short, the Bo­ar­ding School Ini­ti­a­ti­ve is a ma­jor le­ga­cy for the Bi­den ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on that rep­re­sents a long over­due step to­ward he­a­ling. Alt­hough re­cog­ni­ti­on alo­ne is far from suf­fi­cient, the go­vern­ment has cre­a­ted new op­por­tu­ni­ties for Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans to de­mand jus­ti­ce and be­gin sha­ring their sto­ries out­si­de their com­mu­ni­ties. The true sig­ni­fi­can­ce of these de­ve­lop­ments will on­ly be­co­me clear over the co­ming ye­ars, as fu­tu­re ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­ons eit­her choo­se to red­ress the harm done du­ring the bo­ar­ding school era or con­ti­nue to be si­lent on the is­sue. With eve­ryt­hing that the DOI has put in their re­ports, ho­we­ver, Ame­ri­cans have less of an ex­cu­se for ig­no­ran­ce about this to­pic than ever.

***
 Vin­cent Veer­beek is a PhD re­se­arc­her in the Doc­to­ral Prog­ram in His­to­ry and Cul­tu­ral He­ri­ta­ge at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Hel­sin­ki, where he is wor­king on a dis­ser­ta­ti­on about marc­hing bands at go­vern­ment bo­ar­ding schools for Na­ti­ve Ame­ri­cans. He gra­du­a­ted from Rad­boud Uni­ver­si­ty in Nij­me­gen, the Net­her­lands, with a BA in Ame­ri­can Stu­dies (2018) and an MA in His­to­ri­cal Stu­dies (2020). Du­ring the 2023-2024 aca­de­mic ye­ar, he was a Fulb­right vi­si­ting scho­lar at the Uni­ver­si­ty of New Me­xi­co in Al­bu­qu­er­que. https://www.hel­sin­ki.fi/fi/tu­tus­tu-mei­hin/ih­mi­set/hen­ki­lo­ha­ku/vin­cent-veer­beek-9448669